Prognostic impact of metabolic syndrome in patients with primary endometrial cancer: a retrospective bicentric study.

PURPOSE: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological cancer. Its incidence has been rising over the years with ageing and increased obesity of the high-income countries' populations. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been suggested to be associated with EC. The aim of this study was to assess whether MetS has a significant impact on oncological outcome in patients with EC. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients treated for EC between January 2010 and December 2020 in two referral oncological centers. Obesity, arterial hypertension (AH) and diabetes mellitus (DM) were criteria for the definition of MetS. The impact of MetS on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed with log-rank test and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Among the 415 patients with a median age of 64, 38 (9.2%) fulfilled the criteria for MetS. The median follow-up time was 43 months. Patients suffering from MetS did not show any significant differences regarding PFS (36.0 vs. 40.0 months, HR: 1.49, 95% CI 0.79-2.80 P = 0.210) and OS (38.0 vs. 43.0 months, HR: 1.66, 95% CI 0.97-2.87, P = 0.063) compared to patients without MetS. Patients with obesity alone had a significantly shorter median PFS compared to patients without obesity (34.5 vs. 44.0 months, P = 0.029). AH and DM separately had no significant impact on PFS or OS (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In our analysis, MetS in patients with EC was not associated with impaired oncological outcome. However, our findings show that obesity itself is an important comorbidity associated with significantly reduced PFS.

Reproductive and Oncologic Outcomes in Young Women with Stage IA and Grade 2 Endometrial Carcinoma Undergoing Fertility-Sparing Treatment: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in both Europe and the USA. Approximately 3-5% of cases occur in women of reproductive age. Fertility-sparing treatment (FST) options are available, but very limited evidence regarding grade 2 (G2) ECs exists in the current literature. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate reproductive and oncologic outcomes among young women diagnosed with stage IA or G2EC disease who underwent FST. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out on the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Methodology Register), the Health Technology Assessment Database, and Web of Science. Only original studies that reported the oncologic and reproductive outcomes of patients with stage IA and G2EC tumors who underwent FST were considered eligible for inclusion in this systematic review (CRD42023484892). Studies describing only the FST for endometrial hyperplasia or G1 EC were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-two papers that met the abovementioned inclusion criteria were included in the present systematic review. Preliminary analysis suggested encouraging oncologic and reproductive outcomes after FST. CONCLUSIONS: The FST approach may represent a feasible and safe option for women of childbearing age diagnosed with G2EC. Despite these promising findings, cautious interpretation is warranted due to inherent limitations, including heterogeneity in study designs and potential biases. Further research with standardized methodologies and larger sample sizes is imperative for obtaining more robust conclusions.

MicroRNA Expression in Endometrial Cancer: Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Implications.

Background and Objectives: An extracellular vesicle is part of a class of submicron particles derived from cells, mediating cellular crosstalk through microRNA (miRNA). MiRNA is a group of RNA molecules, each of which consists of 15-22 nucleotides and post-transcriptionally modulates gene expression. The complementary mRNAs-onto which the miRNAs hybridize-are involved in processes such as implantation, tumor suppression, proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis that define the entire tumor microenvironment. The endometrial biopsy is a standard technique used to recognize cellular atypia, but other non-invasive markers may reduce patient discomfort during the use of invasive methods. The present study aims to examine the distribution and the regulation of the differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) and EV-derived substances in women with endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect databases in April 2023, adopted the string "Endometrial Neoplasms AND Exosomes", and followed the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We selected all the studies that included patients with endometrial cancer and that described the regulation of miRNA molecules in that context. The differences in molecule expression between patients and controls were evaluated as significant when the proteins had a fold change of ±1.5. Results: Seventeen records fulfilled the inclusion criteria: a total of 371 patients and 273 controls were analyzed. The upregulated molecules that had the widest delta between endometrial cancer patients and controls-relative expression ≥ 1 > 3 log2(ratio)-were miR-20b-5p, miR-204-5p, miR-15a-5p, and miR-320a. In particular, miR-20b-5p and miR-204-5p were extracted from both serum and endometrial specimens, whereas miR-15a-5p was only isolated from plasma, and miR-320a was only extracted from the endometrial specimens. In parallel, the most downregulated miRNA in the endometrial cancer patients compared to the healthy subjects was miR-320a, which was found in the endometrial specimens. Conclusions: Although their epigenetic regulation remains unknown, these upregulated molecules derived from EVs are feasible markers for the early detection of endometrial cancer. The modulation of these miRNA molecules should be assessed during different treatments or if recurrence develops in response to a targeted treatment modality.

Psychometric validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endometrial among endometrial cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a psychometric validation of the endometrial cancer subscales (EnCS) in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endometrial (FACT-EN) among patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary university-based hospital in South Korea between April and October 2022. Participants completed a survey questionnaire that included the FACT-EN. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) and the reliability were measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) under a two-way mixed model. Pearson's correlations were used to evaluate the validity. We also tested known-group validity. RESULTS: In total, 240 patients with endometrial cancer participated in the survey. In EFA, we found EnCS included four domains. In CFA, four-factor solution model was good: CFI = 0.659; SRMR = 0.066, and RMSEA = 0.073. The mean (SD) of total score of FACT-EN was 122.84 (23.58). The floor and ceiling effects were 0.4% and 0.4%, respectively. Cronbach's α coefficients for the five scales of the EnCS ranged from 0.78 to 0.91. The ICC of EnCS was 0.76. The convergent and discriminant validity of EnCS was acceptable. In the group analysis, older age and lower ECOG performance scores were associated with higher EnCS scores. The stomach and vaginal domains in EnCS were higher in patients who had completed treatment for more than 1 year compared to those who were still undergoing treatment. CONCLUSIONS: FACT-EN has demonstrated its validity as an assessment tool with significant implications for capturing various symptoms in patients with endometrial cancer.

[Prevention and treatment of endometrial cancer].

Endometrial cancer is rising in incidence, especially in young women. This rise in incidence has implications for both primary prevention and screening in high-risk population. In the past several years, our understanding of the integration of clinically related genomic and pathologic data optimized the management of endometrial cancer. The updated 2023 FIGO staging includes the histological and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the heterogenous nature of endometrial carcinoma. Standard primary treatment is quite essential, however, selection of patients for adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy remains in controversy. Molecular characterization of endometrial cancer is becoming critical in directing treatment for advanced and recurrent disease, and the addition of immunotherapy to frontline chemotherapy is becoming the standard of care. More attention should be given to increase awareness of survivorship issues and improve patient quality-of-life.

Lymph Node Isolated Tumor Cells in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

Importance: Isolated tumor cells (ITCs) are the histopathological finding of small clusters of cancer cells no greater than 0.2 mm in diameter in the regional lymph nodes. For endometrial cancer, the prognostic significance of ITCs is uncertain. Objective: To assess clinico-pathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes associated with ITCs in endometrial cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database included patients with endometrial cancer who had primary hysterectomy and nodal evaluation from 2018 to 2020. Patients with microscopic and macroscopic nodal metastases and distant metastases were excluded. Data were analyzed from June to September 2023. Exposure: Regional nodal status with ITCs (N0[i+] classification) or no nodal metastasis (N0 classification). Main Outcomes and Measures: (1) Clinical and tumor characteristics associated with ITCs, assessed with multivariable binary logistic regression model, and (2) overall survival (OS) associated with ITCs, evaluated by nonproportional hazard analysis with restricted mean survival time at 36 months. Results: A total of 56 527 patients were included, with a median (IQR) age of 64 (57-70) years. The majority had T1a lesion (37 836 [66.9%]) and grade 1 or 2 endometrioid tumors (40 589 [71.8%]). ITCs were seen in 1462 cases (2.6%). In a multivariable analysis, ITCs were associated with higher T classification, larger tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and malignant peritoneal cytology. Of those tumor factors, LVSI had the largest association with ITCs (7.9% vs 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.37; 95% CI, 3.87-4.93), followed by T1b classification (5.3% vs 1.3%; aOR, 2.62; 95% CI, 2.30-2.99). At the cohort level, 24-month OS rates were 94.3% (95% CI, 92.4%-95.7%) for the ITC group and 96.1% (95% CI, 95.9%-96.3%) for the node-negative group, and the between-group difference in expected mean OS time at 36 months was 0.35 (SE, 0.19) months, but it was not statistically significant (P = .06). There was a statistically significant difference in OS when the low-risk group (stage IA, grade 1-2 endometrioid tumors with no LVSI) was assessed per nodal status and adjuvant therapy use (P < .001): (1) among the cases treated with surgical therapy alone, 24-month OS rates were 95.9% (95% CI, 89.5%-98.5%) for the ITC group and 98.8% (95% CI, 98.6%-99.0%) for the node-negative group, and the between-group mean OS time difference at 36 months was 0.61 (SE, 0.43) months (P = .16); and (2) among the cases with ITCs, adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy alone, systemic chemotherapy alone, or both) was associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy (24-month OS rates, 100% vs 95.9%; between-group mean OS time difference at 36 months, 0.95 [SE, 0.43] months; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with surgically staged endometrial cancer, the results of exploratory analysis suggested that presence of ITCs in the regional lymph node may be associated with OS in the low-risk group. While adjuvant therapy was associated with improved OS in the low-risk group with ITCs, careful interpretation is necessary given the favorable outcomes regardless of adjuvant therapy use. This hypothesis-generating observation in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer warrants further investigation, especially with prospective setting.

Guideline No. 447: Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Polyps.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide gynaecologists with an algorithm and evidence to guide the diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps. TARGET POPULATION: All patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic endometrial polyps. OPTIONS: Options for management of endometrial polyps include expectant, medical, and surgical management. These will depend on symptoms, risks for malignancy, and patient choice. OUTCOMES: Outcomes include resolution of symptoms, histopathological diagnosis, and complete removal of the polyp. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The implementation of this guideline aims to benefit patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic endometrial polyps and provide physicians with an evidence-based approach toward diagnosis and management (including expectant, medical, and surgical management) of polyps. EVIDENCE: The following search terms were entered into PubMed/Medline and Cochrane: endometrial polyps, polyps, endometrial thickening, abnormal uterine bleeding, postmenopausal bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial cancer, hormonal therapy, female infertility. All articles were included in the literature search up to 2021 and the following study types were included: randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational studies, and case reports. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. Only English-language articles were reviewed. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: Gynaecologists, family physicians, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, medical students, and residents and fellows. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Uterine polyps are common and can cause abnormal bleeding, infertility, or bleeding after menopause. If patients don't experience symptoms, treatment is often not necessary. Polyps can be treated with medication but often a surgery will be necessary. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Evaluating the Prognostic Factors and Survival Rates of Endometrial Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Northeast Thailand.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates, mortality incidence, median survival time, and factors influencing the survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients' post-diagnosis at the largest hospital in northeast Thailand. We particularly focus on the impact of access to health insurance schemes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from EC patients admitted to Srinagarind Hospital between 2010 and 2019. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified factors associated with survival, with results expressed as adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among the 673 patients, the 5-year overall survival rate stood at 76.43% (95% CI: 72.72-79.70), and the 10-year rate at 67.86% (95% CI: 62.98-72.25). Notably, advanced age (≥60 years), stage III and IV cancer, and non-endometrioid histopathology were found to significantly increase post-diagnosis mortality risk (AHR = 2.39, 3.13, 4.62; 95% CI: 1.03-5.53, 2.07-4.74, 2.66-8.04; p-value <0.05, <0.001, <0.001). Surprisingly, we observed no significant correlation between health insurance schemes and mortality risk, suggesting that different insurance programs did not significantly affect EC patient survival in this study. CONCLUSION: health insurance schemes had no significant impact on endometrial cancer patient outcomes in Thailand, likely due to comprehensive coverage. Treatment modalities, notably surgery, showed no statistically significant differences, possibly due to early diagnosis. High-risk groups may benefit from adjuvant therapy. Early surgical intervention is crucial, with its association with disease stage emphasized. These findings inform cancer care decisions and healthcare policy development.
.

Low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer with adnexal only metastasis: Evaluation of de-escalation of adjuvant therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess survival outcomes of stage IA3 endometrial cancer and the association of adjuvant therapy and survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was retrospectively queried to examine 594 and 1455 patients with stage IA3 and IIIA1 endometrial cancer, respectively, from 2010-2015. Overall survival (OS) was examined based on adjuvant therapy: multimodal combination chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy alone, external beam radiotherapy alone, and none. RESULTS: For stage IA3 disease, 109 (18.4%) patients did not receive adjuvant therapy. The 5-year OS rates for the no adjuvant therapy group and the combination group were 86.3% and 91.4%, respectively (adjusted-hazard ratio [aHR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-2.18). This survival association was consistent when compared to chemotherapy alone (5-year OS rates 86.3% vs 86.3%, aHR 1.11, 95%CI 0.67-1.83). The results were similar among those who underwent nodal evaluation (5-year OS rates, 92.6%, 86.6%, and 89.4% for combination therapy, chemotherapy alone, and no adjuvant therapy), including grade 1 lesions (96.2%, 89.4%, and 100%, respectively). In grade 2 lesions, 5-year OR rates was modestly lower for no adjuvant therapy than combination therapy (89.4%, 84.0%, and 82.7% for combination, chemotherapy alone, and no adjuvant therapy, P = 0.03). For stage IIIA1 disease, omission of adjuvant therapy was associated with decreased OS compared to combination therapy (43.2% vs 73.1%, aHR 1.65, 95%CI 1.30-2.11) or chemotherapy alone (43.2% vs 67.1%, aHR 1.62, 95%CI 1.32-1.99). CONCLUSION: The results of this investigation suggest that survival effects of adjuvant therapy differ for stage IA3 and IIIA1 diseases. Patients with stage IA3 disease have overall good prognosis regardless of adjuvant therapy particularly grade 1 lesions, partly supporting the FIGO committee suggestion for adjuvant therapy de-escalation in stage IA3 endometrial cancer.

Study Protocol for the Social Interventions for Support During Treatment for Endometrial Cancer and Recurrence (SISTER) study: a community engaged national randomized trial.

Aim: Social isolation in cancer patients is correlated with prognosis and is a potential mediator of treatment completion. Black women with endometrial cancer (EC) are at increased risk for social isolation when compared with White patients. We developed the Social Interventions for Support during Treatment for Endometrial Cancer and Recurrence (SISTER) study to compare and evaluate interventions to address social isolation among Black women with high-risk EC in USA. The primary objective of the SISTER study is to determine whether virtual support interventions improve treatment completion compared with Enhanced Usual Care. Secondary objectives include comparing effectiveness virtual evidence-based interventions and evaluating barriers and facilitators to social support delivery. Patients & methods: This is a multi-site prospective, open-label, community-engaged randomized controlled trial, consisting of three intervention arms: enhanced usual care, facilitated support group and one-to-one peer support. Primary outcome will be measured using relative dose. Qualitative semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a subset of participants to contextualize the relative degree or lack thereof of social isolation, over time. Data analysis: Primary analysis will be based on an intent-to-treat analysis. Multivariable analysis will be performed to determine the effect of the intervention on the primary and secondary outcomes of interest, relative dose and social isolation score. Semi-structured interviews will be qualitatively analyzed using inductive and deductive approaches of content analysis. Discussion/conclusion: Endometrial cancer mortality disproportionately affects Black women, and social isolation contributes to this disparity. The SISTER study aims to identify whether and to what extent differing social support vehicles improve key outcomes for Black women in the United States with high-risk EC. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04930159 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

A novel immune-related gene signature for diagnosis and potential immunotherapy of microsatellite stable endometrial carcinoma.

An immune-related gene signature (IRGS) was established to better understand the molecular and immunologic characteristics of microsatellite instable (MSI) and microsatellite stable (MSS) endometrial carcinoma (EC), and provide potential immunotherapy directions for MSS patients. Top 20 immune-related hub genes were screened by weight gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA), and an IRGS was further established through Cox regression analysis. The molecular and immune characteristics were clarified in IRGS high and low risk groups. Expression and MS status validation of the IRGS were conducted through quantitative real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (rt-qPCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. The IRGS includes 2 oncogenes (AGTR1 and HTR3C) and 2 tumor suppressor genes (CD3E and SERPIND1). Patients in IRGS high-risk group were more with MSS status, higher tumor grade, later FIGO stage, serous histology and elder ages compared with IRGS low-risk group (P < 0.05). Besides, patients in MSS group were more FIGO stages II-IV (42.7% vs. 26%), serous histology (35.7% vs. 5.3%) and with higher IRGS risk score (1.51 ± 3.11 vs. 1.02 ± 0.67) (P < 0.05) than patients in MSI group. Furthermore, patients in IRGS high-risk group had higher tumor purity, more Macrophages M1 and Macrophages M2 infiltrating, higher proportion of Macrophages M2 and Dendritic cells activated, lower proportion of T cells regulatory (Tregs), lower tumor mutation burden (TMB). Correspondingly, subjects in IRGS low-risk group had higher immunphenoscores than IRGS high-risk group. The relative mRNA level of AGTR1 and HTR3C were gradually increase, while CD3E and SERPIND1 were reversed in rt-qPCR. Through IHC experiments, AGTR1(69.2% vs 30%, P = 0.074) and HTR3C (76.9% vs 30%, P = 0.024) had higher positive staining rates in ECs than non-ECs. While SERPIND1 (84.6% vs 20%, P = 0.003) and CD3E (61.5% vs 40%, P = 0.000) had higher positive staining rates in non-ECs. IRGS is a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for EC. IRGS low risk group might benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors, while IRGS high risk group deserve other potential immunotherapy.

Impact of molecular profile on prognosis and relapse pattern in low and intermediate risk endometrial cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The role of molecular classification in patients with low/intermediate risk endometrial cancer (EC) is uncertain. Higher precision in diagnostics will inform the unsettled debate on optimal adjuvant treatment. We aimed to determine the association of molecular profiling with patterns of relapse and survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients referred to The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital from 2006-2017. Patients with low/intermediate risk EC were molecularly classified as pathogenic polymerase epsilon (POLE)-mutated, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), p53 abnormal, or no specific molecular profile (NSMP). The main outcomes were time to recurrence (TTR) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: Of 626 patients, 610 could be molecularly classified. Fifty-seven patients (9%) had POLE-mutated tumors, 202 (33%) had MMRd tumors, 34 (6%) had p53 abnormal tumors and 317 (52%) had NSMP tumors. After median follow-up time of 8.9 years, there was a statistically significant difference in TTR and CSS by molecular groups. Patients with p53 abnormal tumors had poor prognosis, with 10 of the 12 patients with relapse presenting with para-aortic/distant metastases. Patients with POLE mutations had excellent prognosis. In the NSMP group, L1CAM expression was associated with shorter CSS but not TTR. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in outcome by molecular groups are driven by differences in relapse frequency and -patterns and demand a higher precision in diagnostics, also in patients with low/intermediate risk EC. Tailored adjuvant treatment strategies need to consider systemic treatment for patients with p53 abnormal tumors and de-escalated treatment for patients with POLE mutated tumors.

Integration of the Molecular Classification of Endometrial Carcinoma to Select Patients for Fertility Sparing Strategies.

Fertility-sparing treatment (FST) for endometrial carcinoma (EC) is an option for a subgroup of young women with low-risk disease. The low-risk group comprises patients with endometrioid EC stage IA, grade 1, with or without focal lymphovascular invasion. In the era of molecular subtyping, treatment de-escalation for some EC subtypes is recommended. Recommendations for fertility-preserving treatments were developed regardless of the molecular classification of EC. However, few studies have focused on this topic. In this review, we summarize the actual data available in the literature and discuss the impact of some molecular subtypes of FST.

Reduced healthcare access contributes to delay of care in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize delays to care in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and the role healthcare access plays in these delays. METHODS: A chart review was performed of patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer who presented with postmenopausal bleeding at a diverse, urban medical center between 2006 and 2018. The time from symptom onset to treatment was abstracted from the medical record. This interval was subdivided to assess for delay to presentation, delay to diagnosis, and delay to treatment. RESULTS: We identified 484 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The median time from symptom onset to treatment was 4 months with an interquartile range of 2 to 8 months. Most patients had stage I disease at diagnosis (88.6%). There was no significant difference in race/ethnicity or disease stage at time of diagnosis between different groups. Patients who had not seen a primary care physician or general obstetrician-gynecologist in the year before symptom onset were more likely to have significantly delayed care (27.7% vs 14.3%, p = 0.02) and extrauterine disease (20.2% vs 4.9%, p < 0.01) compared to those with established care. Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to experience significant delays from initial biopsy to diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Delays exist in the evaluation of endometrial cancer. This delay is most pronounced in patients without an established outpatient primary care provider or obstetrician-gynecologist.

Reducing health disparities in endometrial cancer care in 2024.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the most recent publications explaining disparities among patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and identify areas of improvement. RECENT FINDINGS: Racial disparities in endometrial cancer care have been identified along the cancer continuum including risk, diagnosis, access to treatment, and overall survival. The mortality gap in endometrial cancer is one of the top five widest Black-White mortality gaps among all cancer diagnoses in the United States. Many publications have demonstrated that the disparities exist, the aim of this review is to identify actionable areas of improvement. To mitigate racial disparities, we must acknowledge that Black patients are at higher risk of high-risk subtypes of endometrial cancer, and their presentation can vary from what is considered typical for the most common type of endometrial cancer. We must address that practice recommendations for diagnosis may not be generalizable to all races and ethnicities, and that racism has an impact on how providers approach a work-up for Black vs. White patients. Finally, we must improve access to appropriate treatment by steadfastly adhering to recommended practice guidelines regardless of race/ethnicity and improving efforts to enroll a diverse patient population to clinical trials. SUMMARY: In this review, we sought to identify specific and actionable areas of improvement to reduce racial disparities in endometrial cancer care.

Molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer: Implications for adjuvant treatment strategies.

BACKGROUND: When determining adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer, the decision typically relies on factors such as cancer stage, histologic grade, subtype, and a few histopathologic markers. The Cancer Genome Atlas revealed molecular subtyping of endometrial cancer, which can provide more accurate prognostic information and guide personalized treatment plans. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the expression and molecular basis of the main biomarkers of endometrial cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed was searched from January 2000 to March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies evaluating molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer and implications for adjuvant treatment strategies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors independently performed a comprehensive literature search, collected and extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS: We summarized the molecular subtyping of endometrial cancer, including mismatch repair deficient, high microsatellite instability, polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain mutated, TP53 gene mutation, and non-specific molecular spectrum. We also summarized planned and ongoing clinical trials and common therapy methods in endometrial cancer. POLE mutated endometrial cancer consistently exhibits favorable patient outcomes, regardless of adjuvant therapy. Genomic similarities between p53 abnormality endometrial cancer and high-grade serous ovarian cancer suggested possible overlapping treatment strategies. High levels of immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed cell death 1 and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 can counterbalance mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer immune phenotype. Hormonal treatment is an appealing option for high-risk non-specific molecular spectrum endometrial cancers, which are typically endometrioid and hormone receptor positive. Combining clinical and pathologic characteristics to guide treatment decisions for patients, including concurrent radiochemotherapy, chemotherapy, inhibitor therapy, endocrine therapy, and immunotherapy, might improve the management of endometrial cancer and provide more effective treatment options for patients. CONCLUSIONS: We have characterized the molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer and discuss their value in terms of a patient-tailored therapy in order to prevent significant under- or overtreatment.